Thursday, February 5, 2009

Why we have the Second Amendment

I recently participated in a discussion about why we have the second amendment and how to support gun rights. As was pointed out in that discussion, the second amendment was added to make sure that people have the right and the ability to defend themselves from tyrannical governments.

In 2002, the JPFO published a list of genocides in the 20th century that have occurred in countries with gun control.

# 1915 - 1917 Ottoman Turkey, 1.5 million Armenians murdered;
# 1929 - 1953 Soviet Union, 20 million people that opposed Stalin were murdered;
# 1933 - 1945 Nazi occupied Europe, 13 million Jews Gypsies and others that opposed Hitler were murdered;
# 1927 - 1949 China, 10 million pro communists;
# 1948 - 1952 China, 20 million anti communists;
# 1960 - 1981 Guatemala, 100,000 Mayan Indians Murdered;
# 1971 - 1979 Uganda, 300,000 Christians and Political Rivals of Idi Amin murdered;
# 1975 - 1979 Cambodia, 2 million educated persons murdered.
# 1994 Rwanda 800,000 Tutsi's murdered.
# 1992 - 1995 Bonsia 200,000 Muslims murdered.

When this is pointed out to many people on the left of the political spectrum they respond with "That could not happen here."

But it has happened here, with the Native Americans and members of the Church of Latter Day Saints. Gun Control laws in the south were often aimed at prevent African Americans from being able to defend themselves, enabling lynchings.

And for things that could never happen here, point out the number of things that were said that could never happen here that after September 11th, have happened here. Suspension of Habeas Corpus. Warrentless Wiretapping.

Sic Semper Tyrannis

8 comments:

Your CISO, Jeff Pedigo said...

Well said. Let's elect some Senator's on 2010 that believe in personal freedom and capitilsm.

Peter Schiff and Rand Paul for Senate 2010 victories will help the cause!

info at http://freeandindependentpress.com/blog

Anonymous said...

The posture of the left is based on two fallacies:

First, that might is not right and hence it is not necessary to defend your own rights by force if necessary; and second, that organised human groups -in this case governments- can be a force for good (as long as they are based on the moral principles of the left) and hence there is no need to resist them.

wilco said...

Yep. As Paglia wrote yesterday at Salon.com "the left has become servants of a soulless collectivism that refuses objectivity or dissent."

There was only one reason for the bill of rights: the people were concerned about the stronger central government that the new constitution was about to enact. From that fear and debate came the bill of rights. ALL TEN of them are intended to protect the people and the states from the central government. Period. Thus, the second amendment was clearly for protection in case the central govt became tyrannical.

Garrett Barlow said...

Lets get someone who believes in personal freedom in office. Neither party are very into gun rights right now.

william said...

i believe the purpose of the 2nd amendment was to arm the average citizen as well as the average soldier. certainly citizens can't afford tanks, jets, etc. but surely i believe the federal restriction on fully automatic firearms is unconstitutional.

Thomas' Pains/Patriot Free Press said...

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. I think to many people are ignoant in the fact that this not only guaruntees us firearms rigts but a right to militia. The right of militia protection is fading extremly fast. American militias are already labeled domestic terrorist, just look at the MIAC report. http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-

Scott Huminski said...

U.S.A. State Sponsored Terror (rock music video) Released

Anti U.S. Police State Musician/activist releases his 5th rock video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXbojImKNlI

Television interview at:

http://www.youtube.com/user/RTAmerica#p/u/1/2KxmgZRUOnU

Ed Cadwallader said...

I agree that citizens' right to resist tyranny is important, but I think it's naive to think that the right bear arms is the only, or the most important, part of the equation.

The investigative capability and firepower of the FBI is such that if the government had, and took advantage of, a pretext to drastically curtail liberty they'd stomp flat you and your .45 and not even have to call on their 2 million+ military personnel.